Enhance SAM with features tailored to your specific needs! We collaborate with companies, universities, and organizations to privately fund new capabilities or analyses. Your investment drives innovation while benefiting the broader energy community. Email us to learn more.

azimuth-by-altitude beam irradiance - defect or user headspace error?

  • Michael Overturf
  • Topic Author
More
22 Dec 2023 09:45 #12780 by Michael Overturf
HelloI just installed 12.17 and very much like the changes.  For some reason I cannot get the shading table to work.  There's a tree to the east and a building to the west and I implemented the respective irradiance:00010002000300040005000600070008000904080100357011030601202530130222014010515000160001700018000190002008202101590220159023015902401590250159026015902701590300159031015903200033000340003500036000
Running without this table gives me good numbers.  If I enable this table, I can a negative energy yield and negative production value.  I've tried various formats, but I think this format is correct.  Am I doing something wrong or is this a defect?
Thank you
Mike 

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Paul Gilman
More
02 Jan 2024 16:47 #12791 by Paul Gilman
Hi Mike,

I can't tell exactly what you're trying to do from your description. Please attach a .sam file that illustrates these results if you'd like me to help troubleshoot.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Paul Gilman
Powered by Kunena Forum